The foreign-born made up 13 percent of Côte d’Ivoire’s population at its independence in 1960 (ibid., 3). The country’s first nationality law allowed foreigners who were present at that time to acquire Ivorian nationality within a year, and children (with foreign parents) born after 1960 were allowed to naturalize by declaration before reaching adulthood (ISI 2014, 62 ; ISI 2019, 5; Adjami 2016, 17). Children of unknown origin were also presumed to have been born in the country and, therefore, to be eligible for citizenship (ISI 2019, 4). However, very few foreigners naturalized under this law (Adjami 2016, 3). In 1972, the nation’s nationality laws were amended to eliminate the ability of children of foreign parents to naturalize by declaration. In addition, the provision granting citizenship to children of unknown origin was repealed (ISI 2019, 4-5). Furthermore, the transmission of nationality to foreign spouses was restricted (ISI 2014, 62). Despite these changes, President Felix HoupouetBoigny granted foreigners rights similar to those of citizens, although the state did not formally acknowledge their nationality (Adjami 2016, 19). The mid-1990s saw a period of increased political and economic instability, culminating in a 2002 civil war. Starting in the mid-1990s, the government began to deny identification cards and citizenship to many individuals of foreign origin (Adjami 2016, 11, 47-48, 74; ISI 2014, 62). Côte d’Ivoire’s civil registry system is weak, and many populations living along the border, children of unknown parentage, refugees, and returnees following the civil war were also denied citizenship or identification (Adjami 2016, 48-52). Since 2013, the Ivorian government restored the right of foreign residents living on Ivorian territory at the time of independence, and those born in Côte d’Ivoire between 1961 and 1973, to acquire nationality through declaration. As of 2018, however, many remain stateless or at risk of statelessness (ISI 2019, 1-2). This policy also does not address the situations of returning refugees, refugee children born abroad, and the children of unknown parents (Adjami 2016, 4852). Persons from Côte d’Ivoire whose ethnicity is Burkinabé, Malian, or Guinean are potentially stateless or potentially at risk of statelessness. Several groups from Kenya are potentially stateless or potentially at risk of statelessness. Most of these groups are descendants of migrants from other countries that settled in Kenya in the 1930s during the British colonial period. The largest groups include the Pemba of Mombasa, whose ancestors came from Zanzibar in present-day Tanzania; ethnic Somalians such as the Galjeel tribe that settled in northeast Kenya in the 1930s; the Nubians, descended from Sudanese ex-servicemen in the British army; and Shona with ancestry in Zimbabwe (Adam 2009; Lochery 2012; ISI 2014; Ndubi 2017). Kenyan nationality law has historically required that groups with foreign origin submit detailed documentation of their ancestry in order to register as citizens (DOS 2017e, 26). Many could not furnish documentation and were rendered stateless. Ethnic Somalis faced particularly tight scrutiny, including a screening campaign in 1989 that made some Somali groups that had resided in Kenya for generations stateless (Manby 2009, 258; Lochery 2012). In 2011, Kenya enacted a new citizenship law that establishes a procedure through which stateless 31

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents