recent persecutory citizenship, revocation coupled with of their their Kazakh resulting non- Kazakh nationality, gives rise to a prima facie claim for asylum under 8 U.S.C. § 1158. Petitioners maintain that the BIA abused its discretion when it denied their Motion to Reopen with conclusory statements devoid of reasoning and when it ignored extensive record evidence regarding their claim Petitioners of a change further in claim country that the conditions. BIA failed completely to consider their prima facie showing of a fear of future persecution because of their nonKazak nationality. This Court has concluded that a decision discretion which “is because argued it was to made be an without abuse of rational justification” raises a question of law that vests jurisdiction with this Court. Chen, 471 F.3d at 329. This is precisely what the Petitioners allege. The Petitioners contend that the BIA committed errors of law in failing to consider substantial 8