under the jurisdiction of the office including the legal remedies. Therefore, the writ petition should be quashed. the Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal, Nepal Civil Rights Act, 2012 (1959), and the matters mentioned in different conventions as cited by the petitioners in their writ petition. The office has not done any discrimination as stated in the petition. Therefore, the writ petition deserves to be quashed and should be quashed. The Ministry of Law and Justice in its written reply has stated that the writ petition is silent about which of the right of the petitioners has been violated by which of the act of this Ministry, and the Ministry has not done any act affecting the rights of the petitioners. There is the provision in the Section 3 of Nepal Citizenship Act, 2020(1963) Rule 3 and Schedule 2 of Nepal Citizenship Rules, 2049 (1993) that names and surname (family name)s have to be mentioned while issuing citizenship certificates. In addition, such provisions have not violated the rights of the petitioners provided by the Constitution and law. Therefore, the writ petition should be quashed. District Administration Office Myagdi in its written reply has stated that the office while issuing citizenship certificate has not made any discrimination violating the provision of the right to equality provided by the Article 11 and the fundamental right guaranteed by the Article 12 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal, 1990 and any other legal right. No discrimination has been made on the grounds of race, religion, class, gender, and alike. Therefore, the writ petition should be quashed. District Administration Office Rautahat in its written reply has stated that the office has been issuing citizenship certificate mentioning the name and surname (family name) if anyone comes to obtain the citizenship certificate by mentioning the same. It has performing the functions as per the policy and direction of His Majesty’s Government from time to time. No one has been compelled to write any caste or race. No discrimination has been made on the ground of race/cast. Further, no constitutional or legal right of the petitioners have been violated and the writ petition should therefore, be quashed. District Administration Office Syangja in its written reply has stated that the office, while delivering any service to the citizens, has provided without making any discrimination on the ground of being Dalit or race, but according to the provision of constitution and law. No fundamental rights of the petitioners have been infringed from the function of the office and the writ petition should be quashed. District Administration Office Makwanpur in its written reply has stated that the petitioners have not been able to establish factually about how the office has made discrimination on the grounds of untochability or on the ground of race and done unconstitutional and so called illegal act. Since the office has not done any unconstitutional and illegal act mentioned in the writ petition and the plea of the petitioners is untrue in prima facie. Therefore, the writ petition should be quashed. District Administration Office Siraha in its written reply has stated that on the matters mentioned in the paragraph 12 (a), (b) and (c), the office has not done any act otherwise, except according to the law. Therefore, the writ petition should be quashed. District Administration Office Ilam in its written reply has stated that citizenship certificate has been provided in convenient way to the persons who have come fulfilling the procedure of the law based on the citizenship certificate of the father and grandfather of the applicants and the documents submitted by them with the application. If the application has been filed within the limitation, to correct any description mentioned also in the citizenship certificate already obtained, the particulars have been corrected in cases the particulars seems to be justified from the evidences submitted. In such situation, the plea of the petitioners that there has been discrimination while distributing citizenship certificate and disregard of the prevailing law is untrue and therefore, the writ petition should be quashed. District Administration Office, Kaski in its written reply has stated that any arbitrary and illegal act as stated in the writ petition has not been performed by the office and the writ petition should be quashed. District Administration Office, Jhapa in its written reply has stated that the office has not performed any act harming the Dalit community, deprived them of the right to live with dignity and respectful life and has not acted against different conventions, treaties and Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal 2047 (1990). The office has not performed any act to deprive them from enjoying economic, social and cultural rights and compelled them to mention occupational caste while distributing citizenship certificate. Instead, citizenship certificates have been provided as per the particulars mentioned in recommendation according to the schedule and the documents enclosed with the application District Administration Office Okhaldhunga in its written reply has stated that the office is committed to implement the provision of equality provided by 8 Compilation of Selected Decisions of Supreme Court on CITIZENSHIP and BIRTH REGISTRATION