6. Are submitted within a reasonable period from the time local remedies are exhausted or from the date the Commission is seized of the matter, and 7. Do not deal with cases which have been setfled by these states involved in accordance with the principle of the Charter of the United Nations, or the charter of the organization of African Unity or the provision of the present Charter." A. objection based on the non-exhaustion of rocat remedies 42.The Respondent State avers that the Applicant could have challenged the decision of the Minister of Home Affairs and lmmigration by filing before him a petition for waiver or cancellation of the "prohibited immigrant" notice and also introduce an application for authorization to return to the United Republic of Tanzania, stating the reasons for the return. lt contends that under The lmmigration Act, 1ggs, the Minister of Home Affairs and lmmigration has the discretionary power to grant exemptions in cases of illegal residence; but that the Applicant never attempted to exercise this remedy. 43.According to the Respondent State, the Applicant had the opportunity to challenge the Minister's decision to publish the "prohibited immigrant', notice as provided under the Law Reform Act, (cap. 310 of the Laws) which offers the right to remedies to people who feel aggrieved by a measure taken through an organ of Government or an administrative authority. 44.The Respondent State further states that the Applicant could have introduced before the High Court of Tanzania, an Application for review as a way to remedy the alleged violation of his rights. 45.The Respondent State argues that the afore-mentioned remedies exist because they are provided under Tanzanian laws; are available and can be exercised without impediment. L7 & & ,9 ^te