ANNEX 1 . 111 MI 10.3: Results assessed as having been delivered as part of a coherent response to an identified problem Score MI rating Satisfactory MI score 2.5 MI 10.3 Analysis Source document There is a lack of independent evaluation evidence as to the extent to which UNRWA’s interventions are be fully built into a coherent, coordinated respond to the problems they aim to address. Four evaluations provide evidence of the coherence of UNRWA’s response finding mixed results. For example: • The evaluation of UNRWA’s Resource Mobilisation Strategy found it to be relevant to UNRWA and fully aligned with UNRWA’s MTS 2010-15, as well as having been sufficiently flexible to allow adaptation to changing circumstances and priorities, although it identified that are further opportunities for private sector partnerships, engagement with non-traditional donors, and relationships with emerging markers to be developed. • The E-Health Evaluation found that the introduction of the electronic information system by the Health Department was relevant but was found to have lacked interaction and integration with the 63, 66, 9, 133 regions other electronic health systems and that there was little interaction between this system and other electronic systems in the agency. • The Evaluation of the Office of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East finds that has been some attempt to offer an agency-wide coherent response to providing a decent standard of living for Palestine refugees but this did not meet expectations due to the lack of a whole-agency, integrated approach to monitoring decent standard of living. • The E-Card Evaluation noted that UNRWA has low engagement with other cash actors and has few broader partnerships for learning and coordination (with the exception of the Lebanon Field Office which has a well-developed partnership strategy). MI 10.3 Evidence confidence Medium confidence KPI 11: Results delivered efficiently KPI score Satisfactory 2.5 Within the context of UNRWA’s funding shortfalls, cost-effectiveness and efficiency are fundamental concerns for all of UNRWA’s projects. Evaluations highlight the knock-on effect of lack of available funds on the timeliness of project delivery. Evaluations also bring out examples where funding uncertainty has led to inefficient project approaches and inefficient use of funds. MI 11.1: Interventions assessed as resource/cost efficient Score MI rating Satisfactory MI score 2.5