52 . MOPAN 2017-18 ASSESSMENTS . UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY FOR PALESTINE REFUGEES IN THE NEAR EAST Annex 1. Evidence table Methodology for scoring and rating The approach to scoring and rating under MOPAN 3.0 draws from the OECD Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide (OECD/EU/JRC, 2008). Each of the MOPAN 3.0 key performance indicators (KPIs) contains a number of micro-indicators (MIs) which vary in number. The MIs, in turn, contain elements representing international best practice; their numbers also vary. The approach is as follows: a) Micro-indicator level Scores ranging from 0 to 4 are assigned per element, according to the extent to which an organisation implements the element. For KPIs 1-8, the following criteria frame the scores: 4= Element is fully implemented/implemented in all cases 3= Element is substantially implemented/implemented in the majority of cases 2= Element is partially implemented/implemented in some cases 1= Element is present, but not implemented/implemented in zero cases 0= Element is not present Taking the average of the constituent elements’ scores, a rating is then calculated per MI. The rating scale applied is as follows: 3.01-4 Highly satisfactory 2.01-3 Satisfactory 1.01-2 Unsatisfactory 0.00-1 Highly unsatisfactory The ratings scale for KPIs 9-12 applies the same thresholds as for KPIs 1-8, for consistency, but pitches scores to the middle of the threshold value (to guard against skewing in favour of higher ratings). 3.01-4 Highly satisfactory 2.01-3 Satisfactory 1.01-2 Unsatisfactory 0.00-1 Highly unsatisfactory A score of zero (0) for an element means the assessment team had expected to find evidence but did not find any. A score of zero counts towards the MI score.