information about his identity, organizational affiliation, or the context of the interviews. The anonymity of the source, the selective nature of the statements, and the lack of transparency raise serious concerns about the credibility and authenticity of the video. Despite these red flags, General Naing uncritically amplifies the video on his account, using it as evidence to accuse not only specific Rohingya organizations like ARSO and RSO, but also activists and broader solidarity networks. While these organizations do carry the Rohingya identity, the General’s framing blurs the line between specific actors and the entire community. In doing so, he indirectly attributes the alleged acts of violence to the wider Rohingya population, reinforcing dangerous stereotypes and justifying further marginalization. However, one user account (Ro Saifullah Patriot) quickly responded to the post, openly condemning the authenticity of the conversation in the video. Rather than accepting it at face value, the user accused the AA of fabricating the video to conceal its own crimes and acts of genocide against the Rohingya community. He alleged that the footage is staged by the AA as a diversionary tactic to shift blame and deflect attention from their ongoing atrocities, and even called it a propaganda orchestrated 89