myanmars-reports-on-implementation-of-the-icjs-provisional-measures-order/> accessed 21 November 2020. xxxii The Gambia v. Myanmar, ‘Application’ (11 November 2019) op. cit. 46 [86] 58 [113]. xxxiii United Nations, Charter of the United Nations (1945) 1 UNTS XVI Art 94(1). xxxiv The European Rohingya Council, ‘Joint letter to ICJ: Myanmar's obligation to comply with the provisional measures’ (17 June 2021) available at <https://www.theerc.eu/joint-letter-to-icj-myanmarsobligation-to-comply-with-the-provisional-measures/> accessed 20 November 2021. xxxv Ground reports received by BROUK. xxxvi Myanmar Now, ‘Arakan Army prepares for war against junta’ (13 April 2022) available at <https://www.myanmar-now.org/en/news/arakan-army-prepares-for-war-against-junta> and The Irrawaddy, ‘Military Tensions Rise in Western Myanmar as Arakan Army Chief Warns Regime’ (9 May 2022) available at <https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/analysis/military-tensions-rise-in-westernmyanmar-as-arakan-army-chief-warns-regime.html> accessed 19 May 2022. xxxvii Radio Free Asia, ‘Arakan Army, not military junta, run the show in Myanmar’s Rakhine state’ (19 January 2022) available at <https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/arakan-army01192022193040.html> accessed 19 May 2022. xxxviii Myanmar Now, ‘As junta directs its attention elsewhere, AA strengthens its hold over Rakhine State’ (13 August 2021) available at <https://www.myanmar-now.org/en/news/as-junta-directs-its-attentionelsewhere-aa-strengthens-its-hold-over-rakhine-state> accessed 19 May 2022. xxxix UNFFM 2019 report op. cit. 77 [240]. xl The UN Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect ‘Framework of Analysis for Atrocity Crimes: a tool for prevention’ (2014) 18-19. xli Report of the Special Rapporteur Thomas H. Andrews op. cit. [78-79] xlii The Gambia v. Myanmar, ICJ Provisional Measures Order (23 January 2020) op. cit. 25 [86]. xliii Myanmar Now, ‘Myanmar junta protests to UN migration agency about Rohingya Cultural Memory Center’ (7 January 2022) available at <https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/protests01072022173000.html> accessed 19 May 2022. xliv See BROUK’s four previous briefings on Myanmar’s noncompliance with the ICJ’s provisional measures order, as well as ‘Annex 1 to the Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in Myanmar to the UN General Assembly’ (2 September 2021) UN Doc A/76/314 4 [19]. xlv The Gambia v. Myanmar, ICJ Provisional Measures Order (23 January 2020) op. cit. 22 [74]. xlvi UNFMM 2018 report op. cit. [607-8]. xlvii All biographical data on file with BROUK. xlviii All biographical data of the deceased on file with BROUK. xlix Details on file with BROUK. l Rohingya Communities Worldwide, Joint UPR Submission 2020 11 [30]. Burma Human Rights Network, ‘Nowhere to Run in Burma: Rohingya trapped between an open-air prison and jail’ (26 August 2020). li See Rohingya Communities Worldwide, op. cit. lii UNFFM 2018 report op. cit. [622]. liii UNFFM 2018 report op. cit. [696-716], [724-728]. liv UNFFM 2018 report op. cit. [696-716] lv UNFFM 2018 report op. cit. [628], [630-649], [652-663], [669-679]. lvi Human Rights Watch, “An Open Prison without End”: Myanmar’s Mass Detention of Rohingya in Rakhine State (October 2020), 3. lvii UNFFM 2018 report op. cit. [689] [693]. lviii Human Rights Watch, (October 2020), op. cit. 91-93. lix UNFMM 2018 report op. cit. [528] [693] lx See video: https://twitter.com/uschimuller/status/981625075953782784?lang=fr lxi HRW (October 2020) op. cit. 119-132. lxii HRW (October 2020) op. cit. 5-6, 16-17. lxiii HRW (October 2020) op. cit. 17, 174. lxiv ICTY, Prosecutor v. Karadzic, IT-95-5/18-T, Judgment, 24 March 2016, [547], with reference to the preceding cases ICTY, Prosecutor v Brdjanin, IT-99-36-T, Judgment, 1 December 2004, [691]; ICTY, Prosecutor v. Stakic, IT-97-24-T, Judgment, 31 July 2003, [517]; ICTR, Prosecutor v. Musema, ICTR-96-13- T, 19