19 | PROTECTING STATELESS PERSONS FROM ARBITRARY DETENTION IN MALTA
to, for example, non-cooperation, absence of information,
practical difficulties, etc.
3.5 ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION
Maltese law makes no provision for alternatives to
detention, saving the possibility for detained migrants to
request bail from the Immigration Appeals Board.80 It is
expected that the transposition into Maltese law of the
recast Reception Conditions Directive will require Malta
to introduce alternatives to detention into national law.
Since, at the time of writing, the draft transposing law was
not made available, no further information may be
provided.
In the context of pre-removal detention, the national
transposition of the Return Directive does mention the
obligation of the Principal Immigration Officer to not
detain individuals if “other sufficient and less coercive
measures are applicable”, clearly requiring an individual
assessment as to the feasibility of applying alternatives to
detention. The Regulations do not provide examples of
such possible less coercive measures, and none are
known to have been resorted to in practice.81
3.6 CHILDREN, FAMILIES AND VULNERABLE
GROUPS
The police asked us many questions and I explained
everything. I told them we were born in Addis
Ababa and later sent to Dekemhare in Eritrea. They wrote
down Ethiopia as my country of origin, which was true. I
also told them we were minors, my sister and me. They
took everything we were carrying, our money, our
personal belongings, etc. I begged the police woman to
leave my pictures with me, the only pictures I had from my
mother. I tried to explain that to her but she looked me in
the eye, and tore the pictures in such small pieces that I
will never be able to stick them together. They brought us
to a camp in some military barracks, but we did not know
what will happen next, how long we would have to stay
and why would they keep us locked up. After all we had
went through, I could not believe I was in Europe.”
Tsegey, originally from Ethiopia
Although the Maltese legislation does not provide for the
identification of vulnerable groups, the public entity
Agency for the Welfare of Asylum Seeker (AWAS) is
responsible for the assessment and determination of
vulnerability in the context of detention. These
assessments are conducted through interviews by AWAS
staff, generally social or care workers. AWAS also
conducts interviews for determining whether persons
claiming to be unaccompanied children are in fact below
the age of eighteen. The Reception Regulations82 contain
specific provisions for people with special needs, minors,
unaccompanied minors and pregnant women, also
enshrining the principle of maintenance of family unity.83
Upon confirmation of vulnerability or minor age in the
case or unaccompanied children, persons are released
from detention.84
In this regard, the AIDA report on Malta states that: “Due
to resource and infrastructural limitations some
vulnerable individuals are either never identified or, once
identified, are unable to access the care and support they
require”.85 Amongst other things, this report highlights
concerns relating to the age assessment and adult
vulnerability procedures, with a focus on vulnerabilities
that are less visible than others, such as mental health
problems. The report comments that the release of
vulnerable persons, particularly of this group of ‘invisible
vulnerabilities’, could take up to eight months.86
3.7 CONDITIONS OF DETENTION
I spent four months and 10 days in detention, four
months and 10 days doing nothing but eating and
sleeping. I could only communicate with the dozen
Bangladeshi people detained with me. Sometimes there
were people visiting detention but I could not understand
or ask them anything. I could not even call my family with
the five euros credit they would distribute to us every two
months. It would take much more than that to reach the
network in Rakhine state, where my family lives. Even the
medical care was scarce in there. We were given just one
tablet of paracetamol, whatever pain we may have. They
brought me to the clinic in handcuffs as if I was a criminal
but the doctor there asked them to remove the handcuffs
and gave me treatment. I sort of understand why we were
often sick. We were mainly fed pasta in detention. I don’t
eat much pasta as we mainly eat rice in my country. We
never had any fruits or vegetables. But we did not have
anything to do in detention, and the yard is so small for all
the detainees, we did not get much physical activity. So
you get easily sick if you have only pasta to eat and never
move.
You feel like a baby in detention, not in the sense that you
are cared for, but in the sense of the total deprivation of
anything that makes you a man. We did not even had
clothes other than what we were wearing when we
arrived and two boxer shorts. To wash these clothes, you
had to shower in them.
Kafil Kafil, originally from Myanmar
But what a surprise when I arrived there. I could
not believe I had finally reached Europe, the
Human rights continent. They pushed us into small rooms
packed with people of different nationalities. They called
it B Block. It used to be a military barracks on which they
had put barred windows and doors, with guards at the
entrance after we entered a fenced off area full of
military. The place was so dirty that I could not bring
myself to shower for 25 days as I was disgusted by the
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents