I(U
THE QUESTION OF HAt.ESTINE
constitutes a cornerstone of the “ Judaization of the Galilee”
policy. Upper Nazareth was erected upon the hills surround
ing Nazareth as a security belt surrounding it almost on all
sides. It was built upon thousands of acres of lands which were
expropriated high-handedly, purely and simply by force, from
the Arab settlements, particularly Nazareth and Rana. The
very choice of the name “ upper” Nazareth, while the stress is
upon upper, is an indicator of the attitude of the authorities,
which give the new town special privileges according to their
policy of discrimination and lack of attention regarding the
city of Nazareth, which is, in their eyes, at the very bottom of
the ladder. The visitor to Nazareth can acknowledge with his
own eyes the neglect and lack of development of the city, and
if from there he goes “ up" to upper Nazareth, he will sec over
there the new buildings, the wide streets, the public lights, the
steps, the many-storied buildings, the industrial and artisan
enterprises, and he will be able to perceive the contrast:
development up there and lack of care down there; constant
government building up there, and no construction whatever
down there. Since 1966 the [Israeli] Ministry of Housing has
not built a single unit of habitation in old Nazareth. |Yoseph
Elgazi in Zo Hadareh, July 30, 1975]
The drama of a ruling minority is vividly enacted in
Nazareth. With all its advantages, upper— that is, Jewish—
Nazareth contains 16,000 residents; below it, the A ra b city has
a population o f 45,000. Clearly the Jewish city benefits from
the network o f resources for Jews. Non-Jews are surgically
excluded. The rift between them and the Jews is intended by
Zionism to signify a state of absolute difference between the
two groups, not merely one of degree. If every Jew in Israel
represents “ the whole Jewish people” — which is a population
made up not only of the Jews in Israel, but also o f generations
o f Jews who existed in the past (of whom the present Israelis
are the remnant) and those who exist in the future, as well as
those who live elsewhere— the non-Jew in Israel represents a
permanent banishment from his as well as all other past,
present, and future benefits in Palestine. The non-Jew lives a
meager existence in villages without libraries, youth centers,
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents