Previous 1 / 28 Next

Jason Tucker The Indefinite Statelessness of Refugees in Denmark and Sweden: Comparing the Impacts of the Temporary Asylum Laws MIM WORKING PAPER SERIES 17:8

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

The Indefinite Statelessness of Refugees in Denmark and Sweden: Comparing the Impacts of the Temporary Asylum Laws

Documents

Author: J. Tucker

Journal / Publisher: MIM Working Paper Series

Volume / issue: Vol. 17

Preview

Description: The article examines the overlap between statelessness and refugee status, noting that about one in ten refugees are stateless. Using Denmark and Sweden as case studies, it analyses national asylum laws and policies for identifying and addressing statelessness among refugees. The paper highlights how temporary asylum measures, cessation of refugee status, and barriers to citizenship contribute to indefinite statelessness. It also discusses challenges like undeportability and arbitrary detention, evaluating these practices against the countries’ obligations under the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1954 Statelessness Convention.

Type of resource

Academic publication

Source

Academia : Individual Scholarship

Region

Europe

Country

Denmark
Sweden

Theme

Acquisition of Nationality by Stateless People
Detention
Identification / Determination of Statelessness

Population/Community

Stateless Refugees / Migrants

Date published: Jan 1, 2017

Source URL: Direct Link

Primary Documents

FULLTEXT01.pdf
English
Download View

StatelessHub Library

Select target paragraph3

The Indefinite Statelessness of Refugees in Denmark and Sweden: Comparing the Impacts of the Temporary Asylum Laws

Primary Documents

Notifications