BIA issued a three sentence order, which this Court found to be “conclusory” and “devoid of reasoning,” as it failed evidence on to account record for regarding a the substantial deterioration of conditions in the Petitioner’s country. Norani, 451 F.3d at 295. Likewise, the Jourbinas presented evidence, including an expert affidavit and numerous country reports from the U.S. State Department and other credible sources, which supports the argument that non-Kazak nationals, like the Petitioners, are routinely persecuted by the Kazak government. R. at 99-134. As argued above, Kazakhstan places severe civil limitations on individuals who are not citizens, including restrictions on the right to work, right to marry, ability to register births of their children, enroll in school, and access public services such as health care. R. at 103; 105-106; 108-110; 118-122; 131. The reports provided with the motion to reopen support these contentions and 34