component of the Petitioners’ change in country conditions argument. The BIA also Petitioners establish erred failed a prima in to finding meet facie that the burden to asylum. The their case for Petitioners claim that revocation of citizenship on a protected ground amounts to past persecution, and that they fear future persecution based on their non-Kazak nationality. revocation of statelessness The citizenship and that BIA’s decision merely that results in alone, can statelessness, never establish a prima facie case for asylum is legally flawed, illogical, overly simplistic, and contrary to persuasive Circuit Court holdings, which the BIA ignores. Additionally, the BIA failed to consider the Petitioners’ fear of future persecution based on non-Kazak nationality, which was argued extensively in the motion to reopen 18 and for which the