exercise jurisdiction. Chen, 471 F.3d at 329. For example, this Court has classified objections to an agency’s factual factors in questions of findings which fact and the discretion which do was not balancing of exercised as give rise to judicial review. Chen, 471 F.3d at 332. However, this Court does have jurisdiction to review petitions that raise objections about the agency’s application of an incorrect standard or its abuse of discretion in ignoring important facts in the record. Khan, 495 F.3d at 35. With respect to a motion to reopen, the United States Supreme Court has held that although the BIA has broad discretion to grant or deny a motion to reopen, higher courts retain jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision. Kucana v. Holder, 130 S.Ct. 827 (2010). Here, the Petitioners petition for review of their Motion to Reopen based on a change in country conditions. Petitioners claim 8 C.F.R. that the 7 § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). Kazakh government’s