SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA JUDGMENT 221. There has accordingly been no violation of Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT 1. Decides, unanimously, to strike the application out of its list of cases insofar as the first applicant is concerned; 2. Declares, unanimously, the remainder of the application admissible; 3. Holds, by ten votes to seven, that there has been no violation of Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 9 June 2022, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Abel Campos Deputy Registrar Robert Spano President In accordance with Article 45 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 74 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the following separate opinions are annexed to this judgment: (a) concurring opinion of Judge Wojtyczek; (b) joint dissenting opinion of Judges O’Leary, Grozev and Lemmens; (c) dissenting opinion of Judge Seibert-Fohr, joined by Judges Turković, Lubarda and Chanturia. R.S. A.C. 73