both the man and woman have guaranteed the right to provide citizenship. Thus, international treaties, agreements and our Constitution and law have offered the right to the mother to provide citizenship; however, the opponents have done injustice to me, the petitioner mother, by trying to make my child, who wants to obtain identity from my name, stateless. time limit expired by sending summon notice on the names of the opponents stating to submit affidavits within 15 days excluding journey time of the road from the date of this order received, along with the ground and reason if the order is not supposed to be issued. Moreover, upon looking into the content of the petition, it is seen appropriate to quickly finalize the writ; hence, give first priority as per Rule 63 (3) of Supreme Court Rule, 2049. Order of this Court, of the date of 2072/3/21 (July 6, 2015 A.D.), reads as above. It has breached the Article 9 (2) (B), Article 10, Article 12 (1), Sub-articles (1) (2) (3) of Article 13, Sub-articles (1) (3) of Article 20 of the Interim Constitution of Nepal, 2063, Articles 1, 9, 9 (2) Subarticles (1) and (4) of Article 15 of Convention on Elimination of all kinds of Discrimination Against Women, Article 16, Sub-article (4) of Article 24, Article 26 of International Covenant on Civic and Political Rights, 1966, Article 15 of Universal Declaration on Human Rights, 1948, Article 1 of Convention on Reducing Statelessness 1961 and Clause 3 (1) of Nepal Citizenship Act, 2063 etc. Regarding the issue of providing citizenship of Nepal by mother’s name, upon the writ petition of Writ No. 0703 of the year 2067 B.S. having including Sabina Damai versus including this Office, directive order was issued by the Supreme Court on date 2067/11/15 (February 27, 2011 A.D.) on the name of the Ministry of Home Affairs to arrange necessary provisions by issuing circulation on the names of all the C.D.Os. nationwide to provide citizenship of Nepal to the petitioner by mother’s name as per law easily provide citizenship certificate by mother’s name by fulfilling the rule and procedure of Nepal Citizenship Act, 2063 and Rule of the same when the children born in Nepal from Nepalese citizen mother; and for the sake of implementation of this, it was sent by writing to the Ministry of Home Affairs, and a letter for information that 3 points circulation was made to all the District Administration Offices through the letter of D.No. 147 of the date of 2068/5/5 (August 22, 2011 A.D) of the Ministry of Home Affairs, has also been received; hence, there is no condition to issued order from the esteemed Court; hence, writ petition should be revoked. Affidavit of the Government of Nepal, Office of the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers reads as above. I, Jayanti Shikari (Khanal), of the petitioners, have been providing patronage upon being single mother of the Gopal Khanal, petitioner son; and as per clear provisions to give identity by providing citizenship to my children by identifying by me, the petitioner mother, pursuant to Article 8 (2) (B) of the Interim Constitution of Nepal, 2063, Clause 3 (1) of Nepal Citizenship Act, 2063, Rule 3 (1) of Citizenship Rule, 1.2 of (2) of Chapter 2 of Citizenship Certificate Distribution Procedure Directives, order, command including mandamus, whichever is needed, should be issued to provide citizenship certificate by descent by identifying my son by me, the petitioner mother. Moreover, my right to obtain and make identity by mentioning father’s name and by identifying by mother as per constitutional and legal provisions by has been ensured to me, Gopal Khanal, of the petitioners; hence, order, command including mandamus, whichever is needed, should be issued to provide citizenship by identifying by mother. Writ petitioner is found to have been unable to mention any where in his/her petition regarding what, what kinds of acts, actions or decisions of this Ministry have breached what, what kinds of the constitutional and legal rights; hence, there is no ground and reason to make this Ministry as opponent; the writ petition should be revoked. Affidavit of the Government of Nepal, Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development reads as above. There are hundreds of thousands of Nepalese across Nepal, like me, who have been the victimized upon being without citizenship. By issuing mandamus to make interpretation in connection to them as well, order should be issued on the names of all the District Administration Offices through the Ministry of Home Affairs and on the names of all the V.D.C. Offices, Offices of Metropolitan Cities, Sub Metropolitan Cities, Municipalities and their Ward Offices across the country through the Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development to make circulation for the sake of implementation of the aforementioned order. Petition claim reads as above. The issue regarding providing citizenship does not fall within the scope of this Ministry; hence, the writ petition filed by making this Ministry, an unrelated body, an opponent is seen to have been meaningless, hence, should be revoked. Affidavit of the Ministry of Law, Justice, Constituent Assembly and Parliamentary Affairs reads as above. The issue relating to citizenship is not the issue of the jurisdiction of this Ministry, but of the jurisdiction of the Government of Nepal, Ministry of Home Affairs; hence, the writ petition should be What has happened on this? Why is not the order supposed to be issued as per the writ petition claim? Submit as per rule after the affidavits furnished or 110 Compilation of Selected Decisions of Supreme Court on CITIZENSHIP and BIRTH REGISTRATION