38
Theoretical error, real-world problems
This citizenism relates to noncitizenism in some sense as sexism relates to
feminism or racism to the pursuit of racial equality. It has been referred to by
JasonTuckerandMatthewGibneyas‘tyranny’ofcitizenshipandofcitizens.46
Itisdifficultretroactivelytotakenoncitizensintoaccountinstructurestheor
etically defined without them.47 Work will be needed in order to make sure
those structures can address noncitizenship. It will be difficult. But it is not
impossible.
The search for an alternative
Thereisdisagreementregardinghowtoaddresstheseweaknesses.Muchempha
sis has been placed upon widening access to existing systems through citizen
ship, while others have proposed ways to enable rights outside citizenship.48
Another approach is to advocate easier access to border crossings, including
internal border crossings.49 There is also a growing body of work arguing for
more radical change. Some advocate recognition of a form of global citizenship
or another kind of universal membership, while others worry that liberal theory
may simply be at an impasse that liberalism itself simply cannot address.50 One
other approach is to critique the very notion of citizenship as currently con
structedandtopursueadifferentpoliticalproject.51
Some have tried to address this by fixing the way in which citizenship is
definedandhowitisallocated.Theyproblematisearbitraryandexcludingcit
izenship regimes based on birth, advocating something like what Ayelet
Shachar calls jus nexi in citizenship acquisition, which would be based upon a
person’s connections within the citizenry. Dora Kristopoulou, who looks at
46 JasonTuckerandMatthewGibneytakeslightlydifferentapproaches.WhileTuckerreferstothe
‘tyrannyofcitizenship’,warningaboutthetyrannyoftheinstitutionofcitizenship,Gibneyrefers
to the ‘tyranny of the citizens’, to characterise the fact that those with membership are able to
have power over those kept from membership. Jason Tucker (2013) ‘Challenging the tyranny of
citizenship: statelessness in Lebanon’, Doctoral Thesis, University of Bath, September 2013,
p.181;MatthewGibney(2008)‘WhoShouldbeIncluded?Noncitizens,ConflictandtheConsti
tution of the Citizenry’, in F. Stewart (ed.) (2008) Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict: Under
standing Group Violence in Multiethnic Societies,PalgraveMacmillan.
47 John Rawls (2005) Political Liberalism Expanded Edition, Columbia University Press, p. 13.
48 Ayelet Shachar (2009) The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality, Harvard
University Press; Katherine Tonkiss (2013) Migration and Identity in a Post-National World,
PalgraveMacmillan;Bauböckibid.;Hammaribid.
49 Joseph Carens (2013) The Ethics of Immigration, Oxford University Press; Linda Bosniak (2008)
‘Being Here: Ethical Territoriality and the Rights of Immigrants’, pp. 123–138 in Engin Isin,
Peter Nyers and Bryan Turner (eds) (2008) Citizenship Between Past and Future, Routledge.
50 Seyla Benhabib (2004) The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens, Cambridge Univer
sity Press; Luis Cabrera (2010) The Practice of Global Citizenship, Cambridge University Press;
Cole 2000 ibid.
51 Engin Isin (2002) Being Political: Genealogies of Citizenship, University of Minnesota Press;
Engin Isin (2012) Citizens Without Frontiers, Bloomsbury. See also Linda Bosniak (2010)
‘Peasants and Citizens in Constitutional Thought’, pp. 9–29 in I-CONN 8.