g
432
‘UNCTAD Assistance to the Palestinian People: Developments in the Economy of the Occupied Palestinian Territory’
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (11-22 September 2017) UN Doc TD/B/64/4 <https://
unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/tdb64d4_embargoed_en.pdf> accessed 3 October 2022.
433
BADIL, Denial of Reparations (n 45), 28-32; Macro Centre for Political Economics, ‘The Working Conditions
of Palestinian Wage Earners in Israel’ (February 2017), 6 <http://www.macro.org.il/images/upload/
items/27348794024004.pdf> accessed 3 October 2022.
434
Committee on the Rights of the Child, ‘Concluding Observations on the Second to Fourth Periodic Reports of Israel’
(adopted 4 July 2013) CRC/C/ISR/CO/2-4, para 65 <https://bit.ly/2KvvwHs> accessed 3 October 2022.
435
Michael Fischbach, Records of Dispossession, Palestinian Refugee Property and the Arab-Israeli (Columbia University Press
2003), 48.
436
For a more comprehensive list of these laws, see BADIL, Denial of Reparations (n 45).
97
4
g
Right to Work: In the oPt, Israel works on undermining traditional Palestinian
industries by controlling the physical space and obstructing industry operations.
The regime virtually determines which industries survive and the type of works that
Palestinians are able to pursue. This has a two-fold impact whereby the Palestinian
working class is coerced into insecure and unstable employment, often in the Israeli
labor market, while Israel simultaneously gives ‘special treatment’ to businesses
that benefit the Israeli market, ultimately driving up income inequality. Palestinians
working in the Israeli labor market are paid 39-44 percent of the pay received by an
Israeli-Jewish worker performing a similar job,432 without adequate health and safety
provisions.433 Palestinian IDPs living in east Jerusalem are especially restricted in
exercising their right to work as they must prove that Jerusalem is their “center of life”
to maintain their “permanent residency status.” Proving that Jerusalem is their “center
of life” is incredibly difficult, costly, and can be arbitrarily disproven at any point
by the Israel for simple actions such as finding employment or pursuing education
abroad or even within 1948 Palestine. This leaves Palestinian IDPs with Jerusalem
residency especially deprived of sustainable and adequate work opportunities.
Right to Education: The Israeli colonial strategy in the realm of education revolves
around the expunction of the Palestinian cultural identity from curricula and teaching
programs, primarily through suppressing “significant information on Palestinian
history, heritage, flag and cities from school textbooks [...]” in Palestinian schools in
1948 Palestine,434 and coercing the international donor community to pressure the
Palestinian Authority and UNRWA to de-nationalize the Palestinian curriculum used in
the occupied territory and in UNRWA schools.
Right to Property Ownership: The Absentee Property Law of 1950 defined
‘absentee’ broadly enough so that it applied to every Palestinian who had left their
usual place of residence in Palestine after November 1947. Once the properties
were acquired by the Custodianship Council for Absentee’s Property, which was, in
theory, not allowed to sell the property, Israel utilized and privatized the land (and the
buildings that were on it)435 through a roll-out of additional laws in partnership with
government and non-government agencies.436 While these laws continue to deny
Palestinian refugees and IDPs access to their properties, Israel additionally applies
highly discriminatory building permit systems, consistently denying Palestinians the
right to build property and significantly modifying applicable planning laws. Israel
also routinely carries out demolitions of homes, schools, animal shelters, and more,
Chapter
g
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents