 TABLE B.1: Households that completed the various sections of the SES questionnaire Number of Number of Number of households households Number of households that that refused households interviewed Number of completed inform that did for SES Total households SES, with consent for not receive without population consumption consumption consumption consumption included in in the report module module module module study area County Study area Nairobi Githurai 38 37 — 1 36 36 Hurlingham 47 47 47 — — — Other areas 85 84 1 1 82 82 Kiambaa 105 105 — — 105 105 Kinoo 105 105 — — 105 105 Kiambu Other counties Other areas 19 19 2 — 17 — Other areas in Kenya 66 66 31 — 35 — 465 463 81 2 380 328 Total Source: Authors’ own calculation. Note: “Number of households that did not receive consumption module” consists of the 47 institutional households in Hurlingham who were intentionally excluded from the module because they maintain significantly different living conditions than the average population, and the remaining 33 households were wrongly excluded from the module.  TABLE B.2: Sample allocation for KIHBS 2015/16 County Number of households Rural Urban Nairobi 554 Kiambu 511 285 226 National 21,773 13,092 8,681 554 Source: KIHBS 2015/16. Note: Only urban national and Kiambu households were considered for the comparative analysis with urban Shona households.  TABLE B.3: Shona questionnaires for registration and SES Module Respondent Based on KIHBS 2015/16 Introduction, informed consent, and location Head Household roster Individual Registration Individual Education Individual ✔ Employment Individual ✔ Household characteristics Head ✔ Consumption and expenditure Head ✔ Source: Authors’ illustration. 36  Understanding the Socioeconomic Conditions of the Stateless Shona Community in Kenya 10183_Shona Report.indd 36 12/14/20 2:56 PM