Nationality and Cases of Statelessness in the Middle East and North Africa
have not been relatively few instances of a change
of sovereignty over territory that have had significant
or lasting effects in terms of statelessness.81 Neither
the short-lived existence (1958-1961) and subsequent
dissolution of the United Arab Republic, a political
union between Egypt and Syria, nor the unification
of North and South Yemen in 1990 appear to have
generated problems for the enjoyment of nationality
or led to statelessness.
Nevertheless, there is one major exception in this
regard, which relates to the situation of the Palestinians.
The origins of their statelessness lie in the end of the
British authorities mandate over Palestine, followed
by the emergence of the state of Israel which was
accompanied by massive population displacement
and Israel’s implementation of a nationality policy
to the exclusion non-Jews with links to the territory
(Palestinian Muslims and Christians). All of this, of
course, against the important back-drop of the nonemergence of a fully-fledged Palestinian state with a
territory over which it can exercise sovereignty. Thus,
in one sense, the root of Palestinian statelessness
is an inadequate response to a situation of state
succession – although the reality is far more complex
81 - By comparison, in Europe, for instance this has been a far more significant
cause of statelessness, with large-scale problems arising after the dissolution of
both the USSR and Yugoslavia.
66
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents