6 MAINOV v. RUSSIA JUDGMENT 30. The Government submitted that Article 41 was to be applied in accordance with the established case-law. 31. The Court awards the applicant 7,500 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable. It also grants the applicant’s request to have the award paid into the account of Ms Tseytlina. A. Costs and expenses 32. Ms Tseytlina also claimed on behalf of the applicant EUR 1,300 in legal fees for the proceedings before the Court. She asked to have the award transferred to the bank account of the Anti-Discrimination Centre Memorial (ADC Memorial), a non-governmental organisation in Brussels, Belgium. 33. The Government submitted that Article 41 was to be applied in accordance with the established case-law. 34. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and its practice in similar cases (see Mskhiladze, cited above, § 64), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum of EUR 1,000 covering costs under all heads, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant, in respect of costs and expenses, payable into the account of the Anti-Discrimination Centre Memorial (ADC Memorial) in Belgium. B. Default interest 35. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, 1. Declares the complaint relating to the applicant’s detention pending removal admissible and the remainder of the application inadmissible; 2. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention; 3. Holds (a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months the following amounts: (i) EUR 7,500 (seven thousand five hundred euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage, payable into the bank account of Ms O. Tseytlina;