introduction19
deconstructed. In doing so, it is shown in this chapter that the creation
and maintenance of an Other, a non-member or outsider excepted from
the social arrangement, lies at the base of the traditional model of citizenship. Particular attention is paid here to recent scholarly literature that
problematizes both the boundaries of legal categorizations and readings
of contemporary citizenship as being anchored in a territorialized nationstate. Moreover, the concept of an incorporation regime as outlined by
Yasemin Soysal is examined to show how self-conceptions of nationhood
and statehood are inscribed in the citizenship regime of a state. With this,
Chapter One begins my discussion of the Israeli incorporation regime.
Chapter Two contains most of the empirical background to support the
arguments in this book. It begins with an extensive account of the numerous ways in which the colonial logic of pre-1948 Zionism was amended,
yet remained a major inspiration in its post-1967 realization. The complex
manifestations of the language and logic of colonialism in Zionist literature, campaigns, settlement plans, policies, and mechanisms of inclusion
and exclusion are all outlined in this chapter. From this, I delineate the
multifaceted discrimination of Arab citizens of Israel at the legislative,
formal and declarative, structural and institutional, and operative and
budgetary levels to illustrate the ways in which the colonial logic of pre1948 Zionism continues to resurface in contemporary Israeli democracy.
In other words, the historical matrix of colonialism within which the
Jewish national movement burgeoned is explained as a main source of the
Israeli incorporation regime and the multifaceted discrimination faced by
Arab citizens today.
In Chapter Three I employ Jacques Derrida’s concept of hostipitality to
describe the hostile dynamic that is requisite to hospitality. Derrida argues
that hospitality simultaneously combines the assertion of a home whose
host both welcomes the Other and imposes conditions of a certain hostility towards the Other. He reveals elements of mastery that condition hospitality, arguing that recognition of the hospitality of the host is an
acknowledgement of her/his authority. Derrida’s concept is used to show
that questions of ‘who is the guest’ and ‘who is the host’, the interchangeability of these roles, and the violent dynamics between them are key to
understanding the development of Arab and Jewish relations as citizens
of the same state. From here, I embark on a two-part examination of
Israeli hostipitality. First, I outline how the Zionist account of the hospitable Jewish state, as a home into which the Arab minority citizen population can be welcomed, is more accurately conceptualized as an exercise of
Derridean hostipitality. And second, I explain that engagement with the
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents