BMJ Global Health
Outcome
The primary outcome was the percentage of children
under five (0–59 months) without birth registration
(also referred to as non-registration) as reported by the
caregiver. This is the inverse of the MICS and DHS definition of birth registration and described children who did
not have a birth certificate, whose births were not registered with the ‘civil authorities’ or whose caregivers did
not know whether the child’s birth had been registered.
The denominator was the number of children under
five included in the nationally representative survey
sample. We defined complete birth registration as non-
registration less than or equal to 5%, indicating that most
children in the country had their births registered.
The DHS questions on birth registration were consistent over survey rounds. However, changes were made to
the calculation of birth registration across MICS rounds:
to allow for comparability, we recalculated birth registration estimates from MICS2 and MICS3 according to
the indicator definition in MICS4, and the estimates
Bhatia A, et al. BMJ Global Health 2019;4:e001926. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001926
presented here may differ from estimates included in the
MICS2 and MICS3 national reports. Online supplementary table S1 provides a description of survey questions.
Covariates
We included three sociodemographic covariates for
disaggregation and estimating inequalities. The groups
we hypothesised to be the ‘best off’ and have the lowest
percentage of children under five without birth registration were selected as the reference category for
analysis. Covariates included: sex of the child (boys
(referent (ref)), girls), residential location (urban (ref),
rural) and wealth which was used in the analysis both
as an ordinal variable (quintiles from poorest to richest
(ref)) and as a binary variable (quintiles 1 and 2, quintiles 3–5 (ref)). Consistent with the DHS and MICS
methodology, wealth quintiles were calculated by the
survey programme based on a household asset index
constructed using principal components analysis where
wealth quintile 1, for example, represented the poorest
20% of the households.41 Because relevant assets may
vary in urban and rural households, separate principal
component analyses were carried out in each area and
then combined into a single score using a scaling procedure to allow comparability. This score was then divided
into quintiles.42
Statistical analyses
Cross-sectional analyses
For each survey, we calculated point estimates and 95%
CIs for the percentage of children under five without
birth registration on average and stratified by sex, residential location and wealth. We estimated the absolute
difference in non-
registration coverage among girls
compared with boys and among children living in rural
compared with urban areas. To estimate wealth inequalities, we calculated the slope index of inequality (SII),
which accounts for the distribution of individual children
across household wealth quintiles.43 Absolute measures of
inequality are more easily interpretable and less sensitive
to small differences than relative measures of inequality.
We conducted tests of statistical significance to examine
whether estimates were significantly different from zero,
the null value, which represents no inequality.
Changes in birth registration
All analyses were country-specific and we estimated change
in non-registration on average and stratified by covariates.
For the primary analyses, we calculated the difference in
non-registration between the first available and most recent
survey in each country and divided this by the number of
years between surveys to estimate annual change. In addition, we estimated change by survey wave. We considered
countries which maintained non-
registration coverage
below 5% between the first and most recent survey to have
achieved complete registration.
3
BMJ Global Health: first published as 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001926 on 16 December 2019. Downloaded from https://gh.bmj.com on 21 July 2025 by guest.
Protected by copyright, including for uses related to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
expect to underestimate both the average percentage of
children under five without birth registration as well as
inequalities in registration.
Because of our interest in changes in both birth registration coverage and inequalities, only countries with
two or more surveys with data on birth registration
were included in the analysis. Surveys had to include
relevant covariates (household wealth quintile, urban/
rural location and sex of the child) and be designed to
produce nationally representative estimates that could be
compared over time: surveys were excluded if birth registration questions were posed differently across years or if
national boundaries changed.
We used publicly available data from the World Bank to
create a list of regions and income-groups by country.40
To select the final sample of surveys, we used information
on the DHS and MICS websites and the dataset repository in the International Centre for Equity in Health
at the Federal University of Pelotas Brazil to identify
the 100 of the 218 World Bank economies with publicly
available DHS and MICS surveys in September 2018.
A total of 68 countries had more than one survey that
met the inclusion criteria. To create our final sample,
we grouped surveys into four waves based on time intervals, which corresponded to the years of MICS and DHS
survey rounds: surveys conducted prior to 2004 (wave
1), between 2004 and 2008 (wave 2), between 2009 and
2012 (wave 3) and after 2013 (wave 4). The majority of
countries (n=57) had one survey per wave. For a small
sample of countries (n=11) where there were two surveys
per wave, we retained one survey per wave ensuring we
included the oldest and most recent survey to preserve
the longest time interval and otherwise selected the survey
with the larger sample size. One country was excluded
from the final sample after applying survey waves as it had
two surveys conducted between 2009 and 2012 (wave 3).
Our final sample included 67 countries and 173 surveys.