EQ 3: What are the gaps and how has the monitoring been done and what could improved? Linkages between Funding and Diplomacy 3.1.a. Where are the linkages between the funding and diplomacy and in what ways has this contributed to the outcomes? X X X X 3.1.b. 21. e What strategies does PRM use at the country level to carry out diplomacy What is working overall and What should be expanded on? X X X X X X 3.3a What are the gaps in the Statelessness response such as the GAP actions and the Ibelong Campaign? X X X X 3.3b. What role does PRM and UNHCR have in addressing the gaps? How can this be done with funding and diplomacy? X X X X 3.4.a. What recommendations do you have for PRM? X X X X X 3.4 b X X X X X X Monitoring 3.2. at How is PRM’s monitoring done? What is the goal and how does it contribute to the strengthening statelessness initiatives? Could it be improved in any way? Identification of challenges and gaps and next steps What recommendations to you have for UNHCR? X FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION WITH REFCOORDS The Evaluation Team held a one -hour focus group discussion (FGD) with RefCoords on the 17 February 2021. Overall a total of 10 participated helping to broaden the understanding of the work, successes, and challenges in implementing PRM’s Statelessness Strategy more broadly beyond the focus countries. OBJECTIVES Specific objectives of the one-hour session were: 4. RefCoords understanding and engagement with the PRM Statelessness Strategy 5. RefCoords engagement with PRM Washington, the Embassy at the country level on statelessness. 6. RefCoords engagement with UNHCR and the IBelong Campaign and GAP and how that translates at the country level. 7. Gather recommendations as to how PRM can support RefCoords to engage on statelessness more effectively in the future. AGENDA 5. Introduction of Participants and Evaluation Team 6. Overview of Evaluation purpose and goal 7. Focus Group Discussion 8. Close and Wrap Up FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 53