3. ENSURING THAT TODAY’S REFUGEES ARE NOT TOMORROW’S STATELESS:
SOLUTIONS IN A REFUGEE CONTEXT
Regardless of these realities, there has been an intensive effort by
the government of Rwanda, host governments and the international
community to repatriate all Rwandans, motivated by both a general
understanding of repatriation as the most favourable solution and
a strong desire on the part of Rwandan authorities to repatriate its
nationals in part to show that the chapter of conflict and flight is
behind it. Since 2002, a series of tripartite agreements have been
signed throughout the region,23 reflecting a policy shift on the part of
UNHCR from facilitating return to actively promoting it.24 With most
neighbouring countries reluctant to offer Rwandans the opportunity
to apply for citizenship,25 with their asylum status under threat, and
with resettlement all but impossible except in extreme protection
emergencies,26 repatriation has become the only durable solution
being offered to most former Rwandan refugees. Zambia is a likely
exception in this regard, as they pledged to integrate 10,000 Angolan
former refugees and are likely to integrate some of the former Rwandan
refugees as well.
As a result, the research showed that Rwandan refugees in Uganda
– many of whom had had services withdrawn – were living with
increasingly unclear legal status. In a context in which many do not
view repatriation as an option, there is logically an impetus to hang on
to refugee status or to integrate. However, the option of doing either of
these legally is becoming more and more restricted, with refugee status
being increasingly contested and naturalisation effectively cut off as
23
24
25
26
Rwanda has signed tripartite agreements with the UNHCR and Burundi,
Democratic Republic of Congo, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Uganda,
Zambia and Zimbabwe.
Human Rights First, A Decade of Unrest: Unrecognised Refugees in Rwanda
and the Future of Protection in the Great Lakes, 2004, p. 13.
As Manby notes, “even where refugees make progress in terms of economic
and social integration, there are often no possibilities of converting refugee
status into permanent residence and citizenship”. B. Manby, Struggles for
Citizenship in Africa, Zed Books 2009.
For instance, on average only approximately 100 Rwandans have been
resettled to the United States of America annually since 2003. See, United
States Department of State and Department of Homeland Security and
Department of Health and Human Services, “Proposed Refugee Admissions for
Fiscal Year 2006”, Report to the Congress, Submitted on behalf of the President
of the United States to the Committees on the Judiciary United States Senate
and United States House of Representatives in fulfilment of the requirements
of Section 207(e) (1)-(7) of the Immigration Act.
86
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents