10 . MOPAN 2017-18 ASSESSMENTS . UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY FOR PALESTINE REFUGEES IN THE NEAR EAST 1.2 O archit rganisational ecture 1.3 norm Suppo ativ rt e fra 1.4 mew F fra ina orks me nci wo al rks 7.5 8. P dat erform Evidence-based a a an p mo planning and nito 7.4 E plied ce ring ffec programming t s i v y stem e 7.3 E applied viden s 7. ce-b ased Strong and targe ts transparent 7.2 RBM in strate results focus, gies explicity geared to function 7.1 RBM applied Str ate gic 1. Organisational architecture and financial framework G .1a 2 er end ood 2.1c eGrnance gov 2. Cross-cutting issues 2.1d Human rights t Op er t en em ag an 5.1 Alignment anag cutt ing emen t 5.3 Cap acity an alysis 5.2 Context analysis en 5.4 R em isk m Cros s 5.5 ip ag al m ed lity spe abi atio n Sus 5.6 tain Imp sh 5.7 io n lem ent l at an 3.1 Resources 3. aligned to fu nction Operating model and 3.2 Res resources support, mob ource ilisatio relevance n 3.3 D and agility 4. dec ecent ision ralis Cost and value mak ed 3 ing bas .4 Perf consciousness, res ed orm our hu an financial ces man cetransparency g kin ma on cisi nt De me e 4.1 urs Disb ased 4.2 ts-b esul 4.3 Rdgeting nal bu tio terna 4.4 Init standards aud trol 4.5 Connisms mecha 4.6 Anti-fraud procedures Re m nt nme ro Envi 2.1b Organisational Performance 6.9 Knowledge 6. ssments in Jo 6.8 t asse Works in ty ili b eficiaries ta n ou cc 6.7 A coherent to ben aring n sh partnerships rmatio n fo io In t a 6.6 ordin r coies 5. artne P nerg s y .5 S 6 Operational planning 6.4 stem e y s try and intervention ag oun ant se c adv gility design support, U e v 3 A ti 6. ara 6.1 relevance and mp o C agility 6.2 m a nt me ge na 8.1 Per for ma nc e 8.2 8.7 Uptake of lessons p systems 8.6 Follow-u rmance r perfo tracked 8.5 Poo sed ce-ba ign viden des 8.4 E ty uali on q ge uati Eval vera n o c 8.3 ion ctio luat fun Eva tion l ua Eva ent em g a an m 1.1 Long-term vision UNRWA PERFORMANCE RATING SUMMARY (2017-18) on ati er Ge Sustain 12.1 a benefible ts 9.4 12. Sustainability 9. Achievement of results Results 11. Efficient delivery 10. Relevance to partners 10.3 rence Cohe 11.1 effic Cost ienc y 11.2 s ines iT mel nd 12.3 g Enablinent m environ .2 12 ble ina city sta pa S u ca 9.1 Results attained 9.2 targeBenefit t grou ps 9.3 Imp ac t Key t men 9.5 viron En 9.6 ernance Gov 9.7 Human rights 1 N 0.2 ob ation jec al tiv es Highly satisfactory (3.01-4) Satisfactory (2.01-3) Unsatisfactory (1.01-2) Highly unsatisfactory (0-1) Micro-indicator 4.3 10.1 Target groups 1.1 1.2 1.3 4.2 Key Performance Indicator 4.1 4 1.4 1 1.5 1.6 1.7 3.2 3 2 2.1