ANNEX 1 . 91 MI 6.6: Key information (analysis, budgeting, management, results etc.) shared with strategic/ implementation partners on an ongoing basis Score Overall MI Rating Satisfactory Overall MI score 3 Element 1: Information on the organisation’s website is easily accessible and current 2 Element 2: The organisation has signed up to the International Aid Transparency Initiative or reports through the OECD-DAC systems Element 3: Accurate information is available on analysis, budgeting, management and is in line with IATI or OECD-DAC (CRS) guidelines Element 4: Evidence that partner queries on analysis, budgeting, management and results are responded to in a timely fashion 4 N/E 3 Element 5: Evidence that information shared is accurate and of good quality 3 MI 6.6 Analysis Source document UNRWA shares its main policy and strategy documents, its external audits, and its budgets on its website. The small number of evaluations that are available are published on the website. Documentation of UNRWA’s projects is incomplete on UNRWA’s website. UNRWA has not signed up to the International Aid Transparency Initiative. It provides information to the OECD-DAC system. UNRWA’s information security activities have not been fully updated. This is partly due to an outdated 2, 3,6, 10, 22, 30, 31, information security policy, and the absence of an information security programme or assigned 61 accountability for information security. UNRWA has taken measures to increase the transparency of its reporting, particularly with donors. UNRWA is taking steps to strengthen its information security policies. The draft policy is currently awaiting consideration/endorsement by the Agency’s Executive Decision-Making Platform. UNRWA is also a member of the UN Privacy Principles Group, and the Agency’s draft policy is based on common principles endorsed by the UN High Level Committee of Management in 2018. MI 6.6 Evidence confidence Medium confidence MI 6.7: Clear standards and procedures for accountability to beneficiaries implemented Score Overall MI Rating Satisfactory Overall MI score 2.33 Element 1: Explicit statement available on standards and procedures for accountability to beneficiary populations e.g. Accountability to Affected Populations Element 2: Guidance for staff is available on the implementation of the procedures for accountability to beneficiaries Element 3: Training has been conducted on the implementation of procedures for accountability to beneficiaries Element 4: Programming tools explicitly contain the requirement to implement procedures for accountability to beneficiaries Element 5: Approval mechanisms explicitly include the requirement to assess the extent to which procedures for accountability to beneficiaries will be addressed within the intervention 4 2 0 3 2