examining the potential challenges | 10.1163/22131035-14020001 5 31 Conclusion If ai machine learning algorithms completely replace human decision-makers in the determination of stateless status, there is a grave risk of serious human rights violations. I have outlined concerns relating to discrimination, due process and privacy. Until ai algorithms are adequately trained to interpret complex legal terms and demonstrate ethical awareness, they should not completely replace human decision-makers. Doing so could exacerbate existing challenges and undermine ongoing efforts to ensure the recognition and protection of stateless persons. In addition, States must ensure that data on stateless persons are reliable and accurate to prevent future biases in the application of ai algorithms. Despite the above concerns, there are some uses of ai algorithms that can assist decision-makers to process statelessness applications in an efficient manner. Governments can turn to ai algorithms, to assist officials, without completely replacing human decision makers with them. Although, if ai is used only partially, significant challenges remain – particularly regarding privacy risks and the accuracy of the information generated. Appropriate mitigation strategies can be put in place to address these concerns. Human oversight is also necessary to ensure information is accurate. International Human Rights Law Review (2025) 1–31