72. Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Case of Expelled Dominicans and Haitians v. Dominican Republic, Judgment, August 28, 2014, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/546db31f4. html. 73. Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Cayman Islands, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Curaçao, El Salvador, Ecuador, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Lucia, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Turks and Caicos Islands, Uruguay, and Venezuela. 74. Brazil Declaration, “A Framework for Cooperation and Regional Solidarity to Strengthen the International Protection of Refugees, Displaced and Stateless Persons in Latin America and the Caribbean,” December 4, 2014, available at: http://www.acnur.org/t3/fileadmin/scripts/doc. php?file=t3/fileadmin/Documentos/BDL/2014/9865. 75. Other countries with automatic unrestricted jus soli provisions in the region are: Argentina, Bolivia, Canada, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, México, Panamá, Paraguay, Perú, Surinam, United States of America, Uruguay, and Venezuela. See Appendix of this report. 76. A civil society led campaign, with the support of the media and politicians, resulted in a successful constitutional reform (Amendment No. 54, September 20, 2007), granting the right to Brazilian nationality to stateless children (brasileirinhos apátridas) born abroad to Brazilian parents, through registration at a Brazilian consulate. See http://brasileirinhosapatridas.org/. 77. UNHCR, Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights’ Compilation Report—Universal Periodic Review: Brazil, November 2011, 2, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/4ed361722.html. 78. Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion, op. cit., 21–22. 79. See also, Rosana Baeninger, “O Brasil no Contexto das Migrações Internacionais da América Latina,” Com Ciência, no. 16 (2001); ídem, “O Brasil na Rota das Migrações Internacionais Recentes,” Jornal da Unicamp, 2003, available at: http://www.unicamp.br/unicamp/unicamp_hoje/ju/ agosto2003/ju226pg2b.html. 80. Ernesto Friedrich Amaral and Wilson Fusco “Shaping Brazil: The Role of International Migration,” Migration Policy Institute, June 2005, available at: http://www.migrationpolicy.org/ article/shaping-brazil-role-international-migration. 81. Franklin Serrano and Ricardo Summa, “Measuring Recovery: Aggregate Demand and the Slowdown of Brazilian Economic Growth from 2011–2014,” CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs, Center for Economic and Policy Research, 3, available at: http://cepr.net/documents/publications/ Brazil-2015-08.pdf. See also, http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/04/economicbackgrounder; http://www.bloomberg.com/quicktake/brazils-highs-lows; and http://www.nytimes. com/2015/09/11/world/americas/brazils-economic-crisis-intensifies-raising-pressure-on-president. html?_r=0. 82. See also, Rex A. Hudson, ed., Brazil: A Country Study (Washington, D.C.: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1997). 83. Roderick J. Barman, Citizen Emperor: Pedro II and the Making of Brazil, 1825–1891 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999). 94 ENDNOTES