on Internal Displacement, October 2011, available at: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/ files/reports/2011/10/host-communities-columbia-idp/host-communities-colombia-english.pdf. 272. See also, Leonir María Chairello, ed., Public Policies on Migration and Civil Society in Latin America (Scalabrini International Migration Network, 2013), chapter 3. 273. Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social, Departamento Nacional de Planeación, CONPES 3603, available at: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv =2&ie=UTF-8#q=conpes%20pol%C3%ADtica%20migratoria%20canciller%C3%ADa. 274. Beatriz Eugenia Sánchez Mojica, “El enfoque de derechos en las políticas migratorias: El caso colombiano,” in Derechos Humanos y Políticas Públicas, Manual Red de Derechos Humanos y Educación Superior, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Universidad de los Andes, 257–308. 275. Signed on November 22, 1969, and ratified on May 28, 1973, available at: http://www.oas. org/dil/esp/tratados_B32_Convencion_Americana_sobre_Derechos_Humanos_firmas.htm. 276. Signed January 26, 1990, and ratified January 28, 1991. 277. Several Latin American constitutions, including Colombia’s, have a set of norms termed the “Constitutional block” (“bloque de constitucionalidad”), which developed from French constitutional theory. This theory is based on the idea that a national constitution incorporates [rules that appear in international treaties the state has signed and that national case law has the power to interpret such treaties. See also, Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes. “El Bloque de Constitucionalidad en Colombia. Un Análisis Jurisprudencial y un Ensayo de sistematización doctrinal,” in “Compilación de Jurisprudencia y Doctrina Nacional e Internacional,” vol. 1, Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para Colombia junio de 2000, available at: http://redescuelascsa.com/sitio/repo/ DJS-Bloque_Constitucionalidad(Uprimny).pdf. 278. In 2013, in reaction to a negative decision on a territorial dispute it had with Nicaragua, Colombia denounced the treaty by which it had previously accepted the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. It no longer accedes to treaties that give the International Court of Justice jurisdiction over disputes. See also, http://www.cancilleria.gov.co/especiales/haya/boletines.html. 279. The Constitution of Colombia, Article 241.10, requires an automatic constitutional review by the Constitutional Court as a condition for treaty ratification. 280. Sentencia C-622/13, Colombia Corte Constitucional, September 10, 2013, available at: http:// www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2013/C-622-13.htm, Section 2.1. (Author’s translation) 281. Sentencia C-622/13, Colombia Corte Constitucional, September 10, 2013, available at: http:// www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2013/C-622-13.htm, Section 2.1. 282. Sentencia C-622/13, Colombia Corte Constitucional, September 10, 2013, available at: http:// www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2013/C-622-13.htm, Section 2.1. 283. Nota de la Misión Permanente de Colombia remitiendo Proyecto de resolución, “Prevención y reducción de la apatridia y protección de las personas apátridas en las Américas” CP/CG-1840/10 (Remitido a la CAJP), http://www.oas.org/es/council/COMGRAL/topics/otrosdocs.asp. 284. http://www.oas.org/es/sla/ddi/docs/AG-RES_2826_XLIV-O-14.pdf. 285. Sentencia C-622/13, Colombia: Corte Constitucional, September 10, 2013, available at: http:// www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2013/C-622-13.htm (Author’s translation). 110 ENDNOTES