‘Migrants’, ‘Mobile Citizens’ and the Borders of Exclusion in the European…
165
other high-income countries’ immigration policies are often characterised
by trade-offs between ‘openness’ and some ‘migrant rights’, that is, labour
immigration programmes that are more open to admitting migrant workers
are also more restrictive with regard to specific rights (especially social
rights).
Public debates and policy-making on immigration vary across countries
but they are typically framed in highly consequentialist terms, i.e. based on
the (perceived and/or real) costs and benefits of particular admission policies and restrictions of migrants’ rights for the host economy and society.
This cost-benefit approach to policy-making has been a long-standing feature of labour immigration policies. Arguably, it is also becoming an important factor, and in some European countries the most important consideration,
when it comes to polices towards asylum seekers and refugees. Some
European countries’ recent policies toward refugees and migrants fleeing
conflicts and violence in Syria and other places are primarily shaped by the
perceived impacts on the national interest of the host country rather than by
humanitarian considerations, protection needs or respect for international
refugee conventions.
A central feature of national migration policy debates in European and
other high-income countries is the idea of ‘control’ i.e. the idea that immigration and the rights of migrants can be controlled and regulated, at least to
a considerable degree, based on the perceived costs and benefits for the
existing residents of the host country. Of course, states’ control over immigration is never complete and subject to a number of constraints but the idea
of control is still at the heart of national immigration debates and policy-
making. The perceived ‘loss of control’ over immigration has been a major
driver of the rise of Donald Trump in the United States, Britain’s referendum
vote to leave the European Union, and the growing support for right-wing
parties across various European countries.
Mobile citizens
The policy framework for regulating the movement of EU citizens across
member states, and their rights when residing in a member state other than
their own, is very different from the restrictions imposed on people from outside the EU (or the EEA, to be exact). The current rules for free movement
give citizens of EU countries the right to move freely and take up employment
in any other EU country and – as long as they are ‘workers’ – the right to full
and equal access to the host country’s welfare state. This combination of unrestricted intra-EU mobility and equal access to national welfare states for EU
workers is an important exception to the trade-off between immigration and
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents