168
chapter five
and sources used in the Political Monitoring Reports, reveals the broadbased readership for which they are intended.
Formulating Palestinian Citizenship
Over the years, critical social science research on Palestinians in Israel,
some of which has been outlined above, has produced various formulations of Arab citizenship, its dynamics and relations of exception. The
formulations of Arab citizenship I will examine below work from the
premise that, in tune with the mentioned Israeli court decisions and legislations passed by the Knesset, the state’s professed democratic principles
are merely auxiliary to its Jewish self-definition. The conceptualizations
constructed in the existing scholarship seek to outline how, for the
Palestinian citizens of Israel, the Zionist hegemonic project of Judaization
defines and delimits Israeliness as a Jewish-Zionist state of being. A state
of being which, by definition and political practice, rejects constituent
elements of Palestinian-Arab existence. As formulated by Dr. Azmi
Bishara:
Israeliness does not distinguish the Arabs in Israel from the rest of the Arabs
in the same way that it distinguishes the Jews in Israel from the rest of the
Jews, because from the very onset, Israeliness has been Jewish-Zionist and
rejected the Arab and even perceives itself as such. In order to be ArabIsraeli, the Israeli-Arab has to be part of his rejection.26
Paradoxically, the constituents included in the Zionist national project are
not limited to those within or even legally tied to Israel itself; whereas
those who are actually within the state and legally bound to it are not
actually viewed as its constituents. Given this reality, Bishara considers the
citizenship given to Arabs in Israel to be incidental citizenship and the citizenship given to Jews to be substantive or essential citizenship.27 This is
because Israeli citizenship was not designed for Arabs: it did not intend to
include Arabs, and only granted citizenship status to certain members of
this community who happened, by chance or circumstance, to remain on
their land during and after the Nakba. Recounting Israel’s self-definition,
Bishara states:
26 Quoted in Jabareen (2002, 202).
27 Azmi Bishara, “Israel, Palestine, and the Question of Citizenship,” Lecture at
St. Anthony’s College, University of Oxford, Oxford, February 6, 2004) Revised PDF epublication. http://www.sant.ox.ac.uk/events/lecturesarchive/Bishara.pdf.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents