x
preface
to a Jewish state than to Israel being a democratic state. But we ought not
kid ourselves. The devastation in the region signals that the existing
expansionism and exclusionary mechanisms of incorporation in Israel as
a Jewish state are simply unsustainable in the long run.
Importantly, at all of the above political and military junctures the
question of Palestinians inside Israel and their relationship with the state
as its citizen-subjects was at the heart of social, legal and political discussions. In Israel, each of these military onslaughts set the stage for debates
on what to do with the Palestinian citizenry, how to instil in them a sense of
loyalty to the Jewish state, and how to maintain Jewish dominance and control in the face of continued Palestinian calls for collective rights and
equality. What these discussions reveal is that the Zionist-Palestinian conflict is not only one over land, recognition or rights – it is also a battle at
the level of consciousness. Palestinian citizens are situated within an
increasingly racialized citizenship regime designed to exclude them. As
such, their continued presence as citizen-subjects penetrates the Israeli
consciousness by acutely pointing to the contradictions within the state
and the unfeasibility of its self-definition and organization as exclusively
‘Jewish’. Put differently, Palestinian placement within a polity that did not
anticipate their presence is a constant reminder that Israel’s settler-
colonial citizenship regime is sitting on borrowed time.
Though most observers acknowledged that the recognition of Pales
tinian statehood is largely symbolic, many also called it ‘the last chance to
save the two-state settlement’.2 Of course, the Palestine statehood bid is
unlikely to revive the imagined two-state solution – an option that contradicts the spatial arrangements on the ground. But despite this reality, any
potential framework for a two-state settlement must also consider the
kind of regime of exclusion within which Palestinian citizens are placed in
the event that such a resolution is reached. If a two-state settlement means
a Palestinian state and a separate Israeli state with entrenched Jewish
domination and control over its non-Jewish citizen population, then this
2 On this, Noura Erakat nicely summarizes the reasons for the impossibility of a twostate settlement: “Israel has civilian and military control over sixty-two percent of the
West Bank; the apartheid wall has further confiscated another thirteen percent of the West
Bank; and the Jewish-Israeli settler population now numbers six hundred thousand.
East Jerusalem, which is part of the West Bank, has been the site of rapid ethnic cleansing
where Israel is explicitly pursuing a Judaization campaign. Meanwhile, Gaza is territorially
separated, isolated, and besieged. The World Health Organization says it will be unliveable
by 2020.” See “Quick Thoughts on the Significance of the November 2012 Palestine
UN Bid,” Jadaliyya, November 29, 2012, http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/8674/
quick-thoughts-on-the-significance-of-the-november.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents