V. SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT The BIA abused its discretion when it denied the Petitioners’ motion to reopen their removal proceedings. In its two-paragraph order, the BIA failed to argument, analyze that the Petitioners’ Kazakhstan’s revocation central of their citizenship and the documented persecution of those it deems non-Kazak constitute a change in country conditions. The BIA adopts an impermissibly myopic analysis of the motion substantial stated as record reasons citizenship are and it fails evidence to that procedures pretextual; consider the Kazakhstan’s for Kazakhstan revoking uses the grant and revocation of citizenship as a political tool to favor certain groups it considers Kazakh and to failed disfavor to and consider denationalized persecute Kazakhstan’s individuals, 17 which others. The persecution is the BIA of central