64 JUDITH BEYER European Convention on Human Rights 1950. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/conv​ ention_ENG (accessed 23 February 2025). European Union Agency for Asylum 2023. ‘Evidence and credibility assessment within the framework of the Common European Asylum System’, https://euaa.europa.eu/publications/judic​ ial-analysis-evidence-and-credibility-context-common-european-asylum-system (accessed 23 February 2025). Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Garfinkel, H. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s program: working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Good, A. 2004. ‘Undoubtedly an expert? Anthropologists in British asylum courts’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10: 113–133. Good, A. 2007. Anthropology and expertise in the asylum courts. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish. Good, A. 2009. ‘Witness statements and credibility assessments in the British asylum courts’, Irish Journal of Anthropology 12: 45–57. Hart, H. 1993. The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Herzfeld, M. 2025. ‘Listening’, Anthropology Today 41: 1–2. Höhne, M. 2016. ‘The strategic use of epistemological positions in a power-laden arena: anthropological expertise in asylum cases in the UK’, International Journal of Law in Context 12: 253–271. Holstein, J. and J. Gubrium 1997. Active interviewing, in D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: theory, method and practice, 113–127. London: Sage. Jacoby, S. and E. Ochs 1995. ‘Co-construction: an introduction’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 171–183. Kelly, T. 2012. ‘Sympathy and suspicion: torture, asylum, and humanity’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18: 753–768. Kobelinski, C. 2015. ‘Judging intimacies at the French court of asylum’, Political and Legal Anthropology Review 38: 38–42. Kolanoski, M. 2018. ‘Trans-sequential analysis, or: a production-focused approach to procedurally organized work’, Ethnographic Studies 15: 58–82. Latour, B. 2010. The making of law: an ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge: Polity. Laws, B. 2024. ‘Self-generated asylum evidence: scripting, staging and desperation in the assessment process’, Journal of Refugee Studies 37: 800–814. Low, S. and S. Merry 2010. ‘Engaged anthropology: diversity and dilemmas’, Current Anthropology 51: 203–226. McGee, T. 2023. ‘Your credibility is undermined: challenges in determining country of origin for stateless asylum seekers: Kurds from Syria in the UK’, European Network on Statelessness https://www.statelessness.eu/sites/default/files/2023-10/CredibilityUndermined_Oct23.pdf (accessed 23 February 2025). Mitsch, L. 2020. Das Wissensproblem im Asylrecht: Zwischen materiellen Steuerungsdefiziten und Europäisierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Mitsch, L. and K. Reiling 2018. ‘Das Wissensproblem im Asylprozess und wie es behoben werden kann’, Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/das-wissensproblem-im-asylprozess-und​ -wie-es-behoben-werden-kann/ (accessed 23 February 2025). Pine, A. 2020. Asylum for sale: profit and protest in the migration industry. Oakland, CA: PM Press. Reiling, K. and L. Mitsch 2017. ‘Wissen im Asylprozess’, Die Verwaltung 50: 537–569. Rose, L. and Z. Given-Wilson 2021. ‘What is truth? Negotiating Christian convert asylum seekers’ credibility’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 697: 221–235. Scheffer, T., K. Hannken-Illjes and A. Kozin (eds.) 2010. Criminal defence and procedure: comparative ethnographies in the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States. Houndmills: Palgrave. Schegloff, E. 1995. ‘Discourse as interactional achievement II: the omnirelevance of action’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 185–211.