the custody of security agencies such as the
Anti-Crime Directorate or Anti-Terrorism
Directorate, or the General Intelligence
branch of the Ministry of the Interior, where
they were at risk of torture and other illtreatment and frequently denied contact with
families and lawyers.
Security forces and militias arrested
alleged terrorism suspects without judicial
warrant from their homes, checkpoints and
IDP camps, failing to inform those taken or
their relatives of any charges. Many were
held in prolonged incommunicado detention,
in some cases in conditions amounting to
enforced disappearance, in facilities
controlled by the Ministries of the Interior and
Defence or secret detention centres, where
they were interrogated by security officers
without lawyers present. Thousands
remained in detention without appearing
before judicial authorities or being referred
for trial.
TORTURE AND OTHER ILL-TREATMENT
Torture and other ill-treatment remained rife
in prisons, detention centres controlled by
the Ministries of the Interior and Defence,
and militia-controlled facilities. The most
frequently reported methods of torture used
against detainees were beatings on the head
and body with metal rods and cables,
suspension in stress positions by the arms or
legs, electric shocks and threats of rape of
female relatives. Torture appeared to be
carried out to extract “confessions”, obtain
information and punish detainees. Several
detainees died in custody as a result of
torture.
In October, Tribal Mobilization fighters
subjected villagers from south of Mosul,
suspected of links to IS, to beatings with
metal cables, public humiliation and use of
electric-shock weapons.
UNFAIR TRIALS
The criminal justice system remained deeply
flawed and trials were systematically unfair.
Defendants, in particular terrorism suspects,
were routinely denied the rights to adequate
defence, to not incriminate oneself or confess
198
guilt and to cross-examine prosecution
witnesses. Courts continued to admit into
evidence torture-tainted “confessions”
without ordering investigations into
defendants’ claims or referring them for
forensic examination. Some of those
convicted after unfair trials were sentenced to
death.
REFUGEES AND INTERNALLY
DISPLACED PEOPLE
More than 3.1 million people remained
internally displaced across Iraq, sheltering
with host communities or in IDP camps,
informal settlements, and buildings under
construction. Many were destitute and lived
in dire conditions, while humanitarian
agencies reported significant shortfalls in
international funding. Thousands fled across
the border to Syria.
The Iraqi authorities and those of the semiautonomous Kurdistan Regional Government
(KRG) imposed arbitrary and discriminatory
restrictions on the freedom of movement of
Sunni Arab IDPs. Tens of thousands
remained confined to camps with no access
to the job market or essential services
because they were without local sponsors
and therefore unable to obtain the official
permits required to enter cities.
Tens of thousands of IDPs were able to
return home to areas that government and
allied forces recaptured from IS, including
the cities of Ramadi and Falluja, after
completing onerous security checks.
However, tens of thousands of Sunni Arab
IDPs from areas recaptured from IS in Babil,
Diyala and Salah al-Din governorates were
prevented from returning home through a
mix of onerous bureaucratic procedures, and
intimidation tactics by militias, including
abductions, arbitrary detention and
extrajudicial executions. Relatives of
suspected IS fighters were barred from
returning and some had their homes
deliberately destroyed or appropriated.
Peshmerga and other Kurdish security forces
also prevented tens of thousands of Arab
residents of KRG-controlled areas, displaced
by the conflict, from returning home.
Amnesty International Report 2016/17
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents